Volume 13, Issue 2 (6-2025)
JRIA 2025, 13(2): 23-47 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ekhlasi A, Mozaffar H, Taghdir S. (2025). The principles of designing Islamic centers with the approach of cultural coexistence: A case study in England. JRIA. 13(2), 23-47. doi:10.61882/jria.13.2.3
URL: http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-1764-en.html
URL: http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-1764-en.html
1- Department of Architecture, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (2364 Views)
“Islamic centers” are among the most important symbols of the presence of Muslims in non-Muslim countries and hold significant identity value. They also act as cultural representatives of the Muslim community in the eyes of the host society. Therefore, their design is particularly important. This research aims to identify principles for designing Islamic centers that help preserve and strengthen Islamic cultural identity while improving coexistence with host communities.
By reviewing previous studies, the research identified “identity” and “coexistence” as its main concepts. These were examined in relation to Islamic center architecture using a place-based model structured around the three axes of “meaning,” “physical form,” and “activity.” The study focuses on these issues from the perspective of Muslim users; therefore, a questionnaire was used to gain a comprehensive and accurate understanding. Since the researchers intend to design an Islamic center in England, the questionnaire—containing both closed and open questions—was distributed among Muslims living in England to identify their needs, views, and visual preferences. The results were derived through comparative analysis of the questionnaire findings, library studies, and previous research.
The research outcome is presented as a strategic model across the three axes of meaning, physical form, and activity, offering design principles that support both coexistence with the host society and the preservation of Islamic identity. The findings show that incorporating symbols of Islamic values strengthens identity expression, reduces feelings of deprivation, and increases acceptance among Muslim minorities, contributing to reduced cultural tensions and a greater sense of belonging. Using shared visual elements and common values also reduces sensitivities within the host society and improves communication. A convergent approach allows Islamic centers to function as both religious centers for Muslims and cultural centers for the wider society, enhancing the image of Islamic culture. Consequently, identity and coexistence are interconnected, and both must be addressed in the design of Islamic centers.
By reviewing previous studies, the research identified “identity” and “coexistence” as its main concepts. These were examined in relation to Islamic center architecture using a place-based model structured around the three axes of “meaning,” “physical form,” and “activity.” The study focuses on these issues from the perspective of Muslim users; therefore, a questionnaire was used to gain a comprehensive and accurate understanding. Since the researchers intend to design an Islamic center in England, the questionnaire—containing both closed and open questions—was distributed among Muslims living in England to identify their needs, views, and visual preferences. The results were derived through comparative analysis of the questionnaire findings, library studies, and previous research.
The research outcome is presented as a strategic model across the three axes of meaning, physical form, and activity, offering design principles that support both coexistence with the host society and the preservation of Islamic identity. The findings show that incorporating symbols of Islamic values strengthens identity expression, reduces feelings of deprivation, and increases acceptance among Muslim minorities, contributing to reduced cultural tensions and a greater sense of belonging. Using shared visual elements and common values also reduces sensitivities within the host society and improves communication. A convergent approach allows Islamic centers to function as both religious centers for Muslims and cultural centers for the wider society, enhancing the image of Islamic culture. Consequently, identity and coexistence are interconnected, and both must be addressed in the design of Islamic centers.
Keywords: Islamic Center, Islamic Architecture, Cultural Coexistence, Contextualism, Islam in the West.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Strategic and practical principals in Islamic architecture and urbanism
Received: 2024/07/30 | Accepted: 2025/03/1 | Published: 2025/06/9
Received: 2024/07/30 | Accepted: 2025/03/1 | Published: 2025/06/9
References
1. 1. ارجمندی، هانیه. 1390. نور و رنگ: تأثیرات معنوی و روانشناختی نور و رنگ خانههای سنتی ایرانی بر ساکنان. ترجمۀ محمدمهدی میرلو و سمیه اسدزاده. اطلاعات حکمت و معرفت 69 (6): 25-30.
2. 2. بهشتی، سید صمد، و یاسر رستگار. 1392. تبیین جامعهشناختی مدارای اجتماعی و ابعاد آن در بین اقوام ایرانی. مسائل اجتماعی ایران4 (2): 7-35.
3. 3. تقدیر، سمانه. 1396. تبیین مراتب و فرایند ادراک انسان و نقش آن در کیفیت خلق آثار معماری بر اساس مبانی حکمت متعالیه. پژوهشهای معماری اسلامی 5 (1): 48- 67.
4. 4. توسلی، محمود، و ناصر بنیادی. 1393. طراحی فضای شهری: فضاهای شهری و جایگاه آنها در زندگی و سیمای شهر. تهران: شهیدی.
5. 5. حاتمینژاد، حسین، احمد پوراحمد، کرامتاله زیاری، و بهار حبیبیان. 1397. بررسی تأثیر مولفههای کالبدی بر دلبستگی مکانی در راستای تحقق محله پایدار، مطالعه موردی: شهر اهواز. معماری و شهرسازی پایدار 6 (2): 65- 83.
6. 6. حسینی، سید باقر، و محسن کاملی. 1393. تأثیر عناصر کالبدی معماری مساجد سنتی و مدرن ایران بر ذهن کودکان. پژوهشهای معماری اسلامی 2 (1): 149-162.
7. 7. حیاتی، حامد، مرضیه فاخری رئوف، و بهاره کاروانی. 1398. نقش قبله در جهتگیری مساجد سنتی شهر دزفول. باغ نظر 16 (70): 49-60.
8. 8. خاکپور، مینو، و فاطمه کاتب. 1396. بررسی تطبیقی معماری دینی در مسیحیت و اسلام با نقد نظریات تیتوس بورکهارت (مطالعه موردی: اصفهان). باغ نظر 14 (50): 57-70.
9. 9. خانمحمدی، محمدعلی، سیروان عظیمی، یاسر رحمانیانی، و مختار حسینی. 1395. مطالعه کمی و کیفی نقش ایوان در خانههای سنتی و احیای آن در کالبد تراس (مطالعه موردی: آپارتمانهای میانمرتبه شهر تهران). هویت شهر 10 (26): 21-32.
10. 10. رستمنژاد، مهدی. 1390. اصول حاکم بر گفت و گو و همزیستی با پیروان ادیان با تأکید بر قرآن کریم. طلوع نور 10 (36): 17-32.
11. 11. رضایینیا، عباسعلی. 1396. صورت ایوان در معماری ایرانی، از آغاز تا سدههای نخستین اسلامی. مطالعات معماری ایران 6 (11): 125- 144.
12. 12. رئیسی، محمدمنان، و عبدالحمید نقرهکار. 1393. ارزیابی هندسی فضایی مساجد معاصر تهران با استفاده از تحلیل مضمونی متون دینی. پژوهشهای معماری اسلامی 2 (3): 28- 44.
13. 13. ساروخانی، باقر. 1380. دایرهالمعارف علوم اجتماعی، جلد 2. تهران: کیهان.
14. 14. سجودی، عادل، محسن نیازی، و سحر نقیپور ایوکی. 1403. فراتحلیل مطالعات رابطه سرمایه فرهنگی و مدارای اجتماعی در ایران (با تأکید بر متغیر تعدیلگر گروه سنی). دین و ارتباطات 31 (1): 209-236.
15. 15. سلمانی، امیر، محمدحسین رحیمی، و مهدی خاکزند. 1394. بررسی اهمیت، اولویت، و اصالت فضای باز در مسجد. پژوهشهای معماری اسلامی 3 (4): 34-49.
16. 16. طاهرطلوعدل، محمدصادق، علی صادقی حبیبآباد، و جمالالدین مهدینژاد. 1395. بازشناسی مانایی ماهیت انگارههای قدسی در معماری اصیل اسلامی ایران مبتنی بر شناسایی هویت پایدار کالبد مساجد جامع ایرانی. معماری و شهرسازی پایدار 4 (2): 17-30.
17. 17. علیدوست، ریحانه سادات، امیررضا کریمی آذری، و رضا پرویزی. 1397. بررسی مؤلفههای هویت و مکان در بافتهای تاریخی با رویکرد پدیدارشناسانه با هدف دستیابی به اصول طراحی بافتهای جدید شهری، نمونه موردی: محله ساغریسازان رشت. معماری و شهرسازی پایدار 6 (1): 39-60.
18. 18. فتاحی، شمساله، و علی عمرانیپور. 1393. تحلیل نقش محور قبله در سازماندهی فضایی مساجد معاصر شهر ایلام. پژوهشهای معماری اسلامی 1 (2): 95-111.
19. 19. فلاحت، محمدصادق. 1384. نقش طرح کالبدی در حس مکان مسجد. هنرهای زیبا 22 (22): 35-42.
20. 20. قیم، عبدالنبی. 1380. ایرانشناسی: نگاهی جامعهشناختی به زندگی و فرهنگ مردم عرب خوزستان. مطالعات ملی 2 (7): 185-226.
21. 21. کیایی، مریم، یعقوب پیوستهگر، و علیاکبر حیدری. 1396. جایگاه پایهای ایوان در ارتقای راندمان عملکردی در مساجد. پژوهشهای معماری اسلامی 5 (1): 68-83.
22. 22. محبوبی، قربان، مصطفی مختاباد امرئی، و مصطفی عطارعباسی. 1395. بازشناخت هستمندی همزیستی درون و بیرون معماری مساجد ایران (با تأکید بر روش فازی). کیمیای هنر 5 (21): 57-75.
23. 23. محمودی، عبداله. 1384. بازنگری اهمیت ایوان در خانههای سنتی (با نگاه ویژه به بم). هنرهای زیبا (22): 53-62.
24. 24. مرادینسب، حسین، محمدرضا بمانیان، و ایرج اعتصام. 1397. نقش کیفی هندسه در پایایی شکلی هندسی حیاط مرکزی مساجد ایران. اندیشه معماری 2 (4): 53-62.
25. 25. معماریان، غلامحسین، و محمدکریم پیرنیا. 1384. آشنایی با معماری اسلامی ایران. تهران: سروش دانش.
26. 26. ممانی، حمید، فهیمه یاری، و سعید حقیر. 1397. مؤلفههای معماری ایرانی-اسلامی و نقش هویتبخش تزئینات. هنر و تمدن شرق6 (21): 37-46.
27. 27. میرشاهزاده، شروین، سیدغلامرضا اسلامی، و علیرضا عینیفر. 1390. نقش فضای مرزی- پیوندی، در فرایند آفرینش معنا، ارزیابی توان معناآفرینی فضا به کمک رویکرد نشانهشناسی. هویت شهر 5 (9): 5-16.
28. 28. ندیمی، هادی. 1378. حقیقت نقش. فرهنگستان علوم 14 (6): 19-34.
29. 29. نقرهکار، عبدالحمید، علیمحمد رنجبر کرمانی، و مهدی حمزهنژاد. 1388. درآمدی بر هویت اسلامی در معماری و شهرسازی. تهران: وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی.
30. 30. نقرهکار، عبدالحمید، مهدی حمزهنژاد، و صبا خراسانی مقدم. 1392. گونهشناسی مفهومی ورودی مساجد در ایران با استفاده از مفاهیم قدسی. پژوهشهای معماری اسلامی 1 (1): 77- 102.
31. 31. نقرهکار، عبدالحمید. 1395. نسبت اسلام با فرایندهای انسانی فرانظریه سلام (SALAM) طرح مدلی (بنیادی-کاربردی) در (ساختار، منابع، مبانی، و ارزیابی) آثار هنری، معماری، و شهرسازی از منظر اسلامی (راهبردها، راهکارها، راهحلها، و نقد فرایندهای انسانی). پژوهشهای معماری اسلامی 4 (3): 4-24.
32. 32. نقرهکار، عبدالحمید، فرهنگ مظفر، و سمانه تقدیر. 1396. تناظر انسان و هستی در اندیشه اسلامی و بازتاب آن در معماری اسلامی. آرمانشهر 10 (19): 79-93.
33. 33. نقوی, پویان, و حامد مظاهریان. 2019. تحلیل نظریات معاصر در مواجهه با زمینه در طراحی معماری. باغ نظر 16 (74): 69-80.
34. 34. ویسه، سهراب، ناهید خدابنده، حمیدرضا حکاکیفرد، و فرهنگ طهماسبی. 1388. ارائه روشهای مناسب در استفاده از مصالح بومآورد. مسکن و محیط روستا 28 (126): 2-19.
35. 35. همتی، شهابالدین، حسین ذبیحی، و محسن کاملی. 1392. تحلیلی بر نقش حیاط مساجد در شهرهای اسلامی بهعنوان فضای شهری، مطالعه موردی: صحن انقلاب اسلامی, حرم حضرت معصومه(س) قم. مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی (14): 43-50.
36. 1. Adida, C. L., D. D. Laitin, and M. A. Valfort. 2014. Muslims in France: Identifying a Discriminatory Equilibrium. Journal of Population Economics 27(4): 1039- 1086. [DOI:10.1007/s00148-014-0512-1]
37. 2. Agius, E., and J. Ambrosewicz. 2003. Towards a Culture of Tolerance and Peace. Canada: International Bureau for Children's Rights.
38. 3. Ahmed, Abdul-Azim. 2019. "Conceptualising Mosque Diversity." Journal of Muslims in Europe 8 (2): 138-58. [DOI:10.1163/22117954-12341390]
39. 4. Alarmouty, T., and R. Hammad. 2020. Employing Heritage Elements in Contemporary Architecture. 3-Mosque's Gates: Case Study in Amman City, Jordan. Journal of Engineering and Architecture 8 (2): 17- 21. [DOI:10.15640/jea.v8n2a3]
40. 5. Alidoost, R. S., A. Karimi Azeri, and Reza Parvizi. 2018. Phenomenological Study of the Concept of Identity in Historical Textures by Location Components in the Design of New Urban Textures (Case Study: Saghari Sazan Neighborhood of Rasht). Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design 6 (1): 39-60.
41. 6. Alrasheedi, G., and F. Almutawa. 2020. Weekend Islamic Schools in Europe: Challenges and Means of Development. Improving Schools 23(2): 190-203. [DOI:10.1177/1365480219869425]
42. 7. Ardalan, N. 1980. The Visual Language of Symbolic Form: A Preliminary Study of Mosque Architecture. Architecture as Symbol and Self-Identity. In Proceedings of the Seminar Held in Fez, October 9-12, 1979, 18-36.
43. 8. Ardalan, N., and L. Bakhtiar. 1973. The Sense of Unity: The Sufi Tradition in Persian Architecture (Vol. 9). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. 9. Arjmandi, Hanieh. 2011. Light and Color: The Spiritual and Psychological Effects of Light and Color in Traditional Iranian Houses on Residents. Translated by M. M. Mirloo and S. Asadzadeh. Ettealat Hekmat va Marefat 69 (6): 25-30.
45. 10. Avcioglu, N. 2007. Identity-as-Form: The Mosque in the West. Cultural Analysis (6): 91-112.
46. 11. Bano, M. 2022. Islamic Authority and Centers of Knowledge Production in Europe. Journal of Muslims in Europe 11(1): 20-35. [DOI:10.1163/22117954-bja10046]
47. 12. Basoeki, O. D. H., and W. Mingchang. 2021. Internalization Of Islamic Values in the 21st Century Construction Ornaments. Religio Education 1(2): 97-105. [DOI:10.17509/re.v1i2.41345]
48. 13. Beheshti, S. Y., and Y. Rastegar. 2013. Sociological Explanation of Social Tolerance and Its Dimensions among Iranian Ethnic Groups. Journal of Social Problems of Iran 4 (2): 7-35.
49. 14. Biondo III. 2006. The Architecture of Mosques in the US and Britain. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 26(3): 399-420. [DOI:10.1080/13602000601141414]
50. 15. Blair, S. S., and J. M. Bloom. 2003. The Mirage of Islamic art: Reflections on the Study of an Unwieldy Field. The Art Bulletin 85(1): 152-184. [DOI:10.1080/00043079.2003.10787065]
51. 16. Burckhardt, T. 2009. Art of Islam: Language and Meaning. World Wisdom, Inc.
52. 17. Canter, D. 1977. The Psychology of Place. St Martin'S Press.
53. 18. Capon, David Smith. 1999. Architectural Theory: Le Corbusier? Legacy: Principles of Twentieth-Century. John Wiley.
54. 19. Chang, H.-J., Huang, K.-C., and C.-H. Wu. 2006. Determination of Sample Size in Using Central Limit Theorem for Weibull Distribution. International Journal of Information and Management Sciences 17 (3).
55. 20. Çizgen, Gültekin. 2012. "Rethinking the Role of Context and Contextualism in Architecture and Design." PhD Thesis, Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU).
56. 21. Cullen, G. 1995. The Concise Townscape. Routledge.
57. 22. Dousti Motlagh, P. 2009. The Study of Entrance History. Armanshahr 2(2): 91-104.
58. 23. Effendi, M. N. 2023. Reposisi Peranan Dan Fungsi Perpustakaan Masjid Dalam Mencerdaskan Umat Islam. Jurnal El-Pustaka 1(1): 01-13.
59. 24. Erzen, J. 2011. Reading Mosques: Meaning and Architecture in Islam. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69(1): 125-131. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6245.2010.01453.x]
60. 25. Falahat, M. S. 2005. The Role of Physical Design in the Mosque's Sense of Place. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba 22 (22): 35- 42.
61. 26. Farrag, E. 2017. Architecture of Mosques and Islamic Centers in non-Muslim Context. Alexandria Engineering Journal 56(4): 613-620. [DOI:10.1016/j.aej.2017.08.001]
62. 27. Fathy, H. 2010. Architecture for the Poor: An Experiment in Rural Egypt. University of Chicago Press.
63. 28. Fattahi, S., and A. Omrani Pour. 2014. Analysis of the Role of Qebla in the Spatial Organization of Contemporary Mosques in Ilam City. Journal Of Researches in Islamic Architecture 1(2): 95-111.
64. 29. Firdaus, M., B. Amin, and Muhammad Chaidar Febriansyah. 2022. Penerapan Konsep Arsitektur Islam Dalam Desain Masjid Islamic Center Di Kabupaten Bantaeng. TIMPALAJA: Architecture Student Journals 4(2): 133-142. [DOI:10.24252/timpalaja.v4i2a4]
65. 30. Forsyth, D. R. 2018. Group Dynamics. Cengage Learning.
66. 31. Fugate, G. N. 2014. Creating an Islamic Sense of Place: Building Conversion and the American Mosque. In ARCC Conference Repository.
67. 32. Ghayyem, A. 2001. Iranology: A Sociological Look at the Life and Culture of the Arab People of Khuzestan. National Studies Journal 2 (7): 185-226.
68. 33. Hamdy, Rawaa Fadhel, and Fawzia Irhayyim Al-Assadi. 2023. Aesthetic Values in Islamic Ornamentation - Abbasid Architecture as a Model. 020073. [DOI:10.1063/5.0106153]
69. 34. Hamzenajad, M., A. H. Noghrekar, and S. Khorasani Moghadam. 2014. Conceptual Typology of the Entrance of Mosques in Iran Using Sacred Concepts. Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture 1(1): 75-100.
70. 35. Hataminejad, H., A. Pourahmad, K. Ziari, and B. Habibian. 2018. Investigating the Effect of Physical Components on Place Attachment in Order to Fulfilling Sustainable Neighborhood, Case Study: Ahwaz City. Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design 6 (2): 65-83.
71. 36. Hayati, H., M. Fakheri Raouf, and B. Karavani. 2019. The Role of Qibla in the Orientation of the Traditional Mosques in Dezful City. Bagh-E-Nazar 16(70): 55-70.
72. 37. Hemmati, S., H. Zabihi, and M. Kameli. 2014. An Analysis on the Role of The Mosques Courtyard in Islamic Cities as Urban Spaces (A Case Study: Islamic Revolution Courtyard in the Sanctuary of Hazrate Masoumeh (S) In Qom). Journal of Studies on Iranian Islamic City (14): 43-50.
73. 38. Hillenbrand, R. 1994. Islamic Architecture: Form, Function, and Meaning. New York: Columbia University Press.
74. 39. Hosseini, S. B., and M. Kameli. 2014. The Effect of Structural Elements in Traditional and Modern Mosques on the Minds of Children in Iran. Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture 2(1): 149-162.
75. 40. Kahera, A. I., L. Abdulmalik, and C. Anz. 2009. Design Criteria for Mosques and Islamic Centers: Art, Architecture and Worship. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780080940786]
76. 41. Kamal, M. A. 2021. Minarets As a Vital Element of Indo-Islamic Architecture: Evolution and Morphology. Journal Of Islamic Architecture 6(3): 203-209. [DOI:10.18860/jia.v6i3.7711]
77. 42. Kassim, N., N. Abdullah, and M. Taib. 2014. Decoration in Praying Hall of Mosque: A Review of Current Literature. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences (153):55-60. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.040]
78. 43. Kero, P., & Lee, D. (2016). Likert is Pronounced "LICK-urt" not "LIE-kurt" and the Data are Ordinal not Interval. Journal of Applied Measurement, 17(4), 502-509.
79. 44. Khakpour, M., and F. Kateb. 2017. A Comparative Study of Religious Architecture in Christianity and Islam A Criticism of Titus Burckhardt's Theory. Bagh-E Nazar 14(50): 57-68.
80. 45. Khalidi, O. 1998. 13 Approaches to Mosque Design in North America. Muslims on the Americanization Path. New York: Oxford Academic.
81. 46. Khan, H. 2008. Contemporary Mosque Architecture. Isim Review 21(1): 52-53.
82. 47. Khanmohammadi, M., S. Azimi, Y. Rahmanei, and M. Hossaini. 2016. Studying The Qualitative and Quantitative Roles of Ivan in Traditional Houses and Revitalization of Them in the Shape of the Terrace (Case Study: Mid-Rise Apartments in Tehran). Hoviateshahr 10(26): 21-32.
83. 48. Kiaee, M., Y. Peyvastehgar, and A. A. Heidari. 2017. Eyvan Basic Position to Improve Operational Efficiency in Mosques. Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture 5(1): 68-83.
84. 49. Lewicka, M. 2008. Place Attachment, Place Identity, and Place Memory: Restoring the Forgotten City Past. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28(3): 209-231. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.001]
85. 50. Liu, E., & Freestone, R. (2016). Revisiting Place and Placelessness. In Place and Placelessness Revisited. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315676456-1]
86. 51. Lotfi, A. 2001. Creating Muslim space in the USA: Masjid and Islamic Centers. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 12(2): 235-254. [DOI:10.1080/09596410120051791]
87. 52. Mahboobi, G., M. Mokhtabad, and M. Attarabbasi. 2017. Realization of the Symbiosis of Interior and Exterior in the Architecture of Mosques in Iran (with an Emphasis on Fuzzy Method). Kimiahonar 5(21): 57-75.
88. 53. Mahboobi, G., M. Mokhtabad, I. Etesam, and M. Attarabbasi. 2018. Symbiosis of Inside and Outside in Architecture of The Naqsh-E Jahan Square. Bagh-E Nazar 15(58): 51-64.
89. 54. Mahmoudi, A. 2005. A Review of the Significance of The El Van in Traditional Houses (In Particular as Related to the City of Bam). Honar-Ha-e-Ziba (22): 53-62.
90. 55. Mamani, H., F. Yari, and S. Haghir. 2018. Components of Iranian-Islamic Architecture and the Identity-Constructing Role of Embellishments. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient 6(21): 37-46.
91. 56. Memarian, G. H., and M. K. Pirnia. 2013. Introduction to Iranian Islamic Architecture. Tehran: Soroush-e Danesh.
92. 57. Mirshahzadeh, S., S. G. Eslami, and A. Einifar. 2012. The Role of Borderline-Hybrid Space in Signifying Process: Evaluation of Interpretation Potentiality of the Space Employing Semiotic Approach. Hoviateshahr 5(9): 5-16.
93. 58. Montgomery, J. 1998. Making A City: Urbanity, Vitality and Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design 3(1): 93-116. [DOI:10.1080/13574809808724418]
94. 59. Moradinasab, H., M. Bemanian, and I. Etesam. 2019. Qualitative Role of Geometry in Formal Stability of the Central Courtyard of Iranian Mosques. Journal of Architectural Thought 2(4): 53-62.
95. 60. Morbidoni, M. 2013. The Mosque in the European City: Testing the Cohabitation. Planum. The Journal of Urbanism 27(2): 25-33.
96. 61. Munson, C., and B. H. Chetkow-Yanoov. 1999. Celebrating Diversity: Coexisting in a Multicultural Society. New York: Routledge.
97. 62. Nadimi, H. 1999. The Truth of the Pattern. Letter from the Academy of Sciences 14(6): 19-34.
98. 63. Naghavi, Pooyan, and Hamed Mazaherian. 2019. "Analysis of Contemporary Theories When Encountering the Context in Architectural Design." The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar 16 (74): 69-80. [DOI:10.22034/bagh.2019.174193.4023.]
99. 64. Nata, A. 2021. Peran dan Fungsi Masjid di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Islam. Ta'dibuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 10(3): Article 3. [DOI:10.32832/tadibuna.v10i3.5203]
100. 65. Necipoglu, G., and M. al-Asad. 1996. The Topkapi Scroll-Geometry and Ornament in Islamic Architecture. Oxford University Press.
101. 66. Noghrehkar A. 2016. The Interrelation between Islam and Human Processes Theory of (Salam). Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture 4(3): 4-24.
102. 67. Noghrekar, A., A. M. Ranjbarkermani, and M. Hamzenajad. 2008. An Introduction to Islamic Identity in Architecture and Urbanism. Tehran: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development.
103. 68. Noghrekar, A., F. Mozaffar, and S. Taghdir. 2017. Communication of Man and Universe in Islam: The Reflection in Islamic Architecture, Based on Transcendent Wisdom. Armanshahr 10(19): 79-93.
104. 69. Norzalifa, Z. A. 2003. The Expression of The Interior Decoration in The Traditional Mosque in Malacca-A Critical Reviews of Its Elements in Relation to Islamic Arts. MA Thesis, Universiti Teknologi MARA.
105. 70. Othman, A. S. 2023. Rooting the Term and the Architectural Element "Iwan" in Ancient Civilizations. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Heritage Research 6 (2): 57-75. [DOI:10.21608/ijmshr.2023.206462.1010]
106. 71. Othman, R., and Y. Ahmad. 2011. Importance of Motif and Ornamentation in Mosque Architecture. Journal of Design+ Built (2).
107. 72. Porter, Tom. 2004. Archispeak: An Illustrated Guide to Architectural Terms. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203643150]
108. 73. Proshansky, H. M. 1978. The City and Self-Identity. Environment and Behavior 10(2): 147-169. [DOI:10.1177/0013916578102002]
109. 74. Punter, J. 1991. Participation in the Design of Urban Space. Landscape Design 200(1): 24-27.
110. 75. Raeisi, M. M., and A. Noghrekar. 2014. Geometric-Spatial Evaluation of Tehran Contemporary Mosques by Using Thematic Analysis of Religious Texts. Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture 1(4): 30-46.
111. 76. Raza, M. S. 1991. Islam in Britain: Past, Present and the Future. Volcano Press.
112. 77. Rezaeinia, A. A. 2017. The Form of Iwan in the Context of Iranian Architecture, From the Beginning to the Early Islamic Centuries. Journal of Architecture Studies 6(11): 125-144.
113. 78. Rostam Nejad, Mehdi. 2011. Principles Governing Dialogue and Coexistence with Followers of Religions (With Emphasis on the Holy Quran). Journal of Islamic Wisdom and Philosophy 10 (36): 17-32.
114. 79. Roy, Olivier. 2017. Jihad and Death: The Global Appeal of Islamic State. Oxford University Press.Saint, J., A. England, A. M. Ali, and L. Bonnett. 2022. The Effect of Different Statistical Approaches on Image Quality Data Obtained from Radiological Examinations. Radiography 28(2): 518-523. [DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2021.11.006]
115. 80. Salmani, A., M. H. Rahimi, and M. Khakzand. 2016. Analysis of the Importance, Priority and Originality of Open Space in the Mosque. Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture 3(4): 34-49. Sid.
116. 81. Sandercock, L., and R. Bridgman, R. 1999. Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. Canadian Journal of Urban Research 8(1): 108.
117. 82. Sarookhani, B. 2001. The Social Sciences Encyclopedia. Tehran: Keyhan.
118. 83. Schulz, C. N. 1980. Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. London: Academy Editions.
119. 84. Serageldin, I. 1996. Introduction: A Critical Methodology for Discussing the Contemporary Mosque. Architecture of the Contemporary Mosque: 12-19.
120. 85. Siapera, E. 2006. Multiculturalism Online: The Internet and the Dilemmas of Multicultural Politics. European Journal of Cultural Studies 9(1): 5-24. [DOI:10.1177/1367549406060804]
121. 86. Sojoodi, A., M. Niazi, and S. Naghipoor. 2024. Meta-Analysis of Studies on the Relationship Cultural Capital and Social Tolerance (With an Emphasis on Age Category Moderator Variables). Religion and Communication 31 (1): 209-236.
122. 87. Steyn, G. 2018. Architecture and Identity: Colors, Textures and Materials that Speak of South Africa. South African Journal of Art History 33(1): 41-65.
123. 88. SUTRIYONO, S. 2021. Peran Dan Fungsi Sosial Masjid Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Keagamaan Masyarakat Desa Palalangan. KASBANA: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 1(2): 125-141. [DOI:10.53948/kasbana.v1i2.28]
124. 89. Taghdir, S. 2017. Explaining the Human Perception Levels and Process and Its Role in the Quality of Creation of Architectural Works Based on Transcendent Wisdom. Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture 5(1): 48-67.
125. 90. Taher Tolou Del, M. S., J. Mahdinejad, and A. Sadeghi Habib Abad. 2017. Recognition of Durability of Sacred Images' Nature in the Iran Islamic Traditional Architecture Based on Identification of The Stable Identity of Iranian Congregational Mosques. Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design 4(2): 17-30.
126. 91. Tamis‐LeMonda, C. S., N. Way, D. Hughes, H. Yoshikawa, R. K. Kalman, and E. Y. Niwa. 2008. Parents' Goals for Children: The Dynamic Coexistence of Individualism and Collectivism in Cultures and Individuals. Social Development 17(1): 183-209. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00419.x]
127. 92. Tang, Y. 2015. The Coexistence of Cultural Diversity: Sources of the Value of Harmony in Diversity. In Confucianism, Buddhism, Daoism, Christianity and Chinese Culture (pp.285-290). [DOI:10.1007/978-3-662-45533-3_23]
128. 93. Tavassoli, M., and N. Bonyadi. 1992. Urban Space Design: Urban Spaces and Their Place in City Life and Landscape. Tehran: Shahidi.
129. 94. Todd, R. W. 2011. Analyzing and Interpreting Rating Scale Data from Questionnaires. Reflections (14): 69-77. [DOI:10.61508/refl.v14i0.114230]
130. 95. Usman, I. 2020. Revitalizing the Role and Function of the Mosque as a Center for Da'wah Activities and Community Development. SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 4 (1). [DOI:10.22373/sjhk.v4i1.7050]
131. 96. Veiseh, S., N. Khodabandeh, H. Hakkakifard, and F. Tahmasbi. 2009. Appropriate Methods in use of local Building Materials. JHRE 28 (126): 2- 19.
132. 97. Verkaaik, O. 2012. Designing the Anti-Mosque: Identity, Religion and Affect in Contemporary European Mosque Design. Social Anthropology 20(2): 161-176. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8676.2012.00198.x]
133. 98. Verkaaik, O. 2020. The Anticipated Mosque: The Political Effect of a Planned Building. City & Society 32(1): 118-136. [DOI:10.1111/ciso.12241]
134. 99. Von Meiss, P. 2013. Elements of Architecture: From Form to Place+ Tectonics. EPFL Press. [DOI:10.4324/9781315024691]
135. 100. Zahra, F. 2022. Spiritual Aesthetics of Islamic Ornamentation and The Aesthetic Value in Islamic Architecture. Islamic Thought and Civilization 12 (1). [DOI:10.32350/jitc.121.08]
136. 101. Zahra, F., and S. Shahir. 2022. Development and Evolution of Palmette Ornament: An Influence on Islamic Architecture. Landscape Architecture and Art 21(21): 124-130. [DOI:10.22616/j.landarchart.2022.21.13]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
