Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Aburayya

Mohamed Hadi Al Najdawi, Zainab Al Ghurabli, Raghda Raafat, Ahmad Aburayya,
Volume 36, Issue 3 (IJIEPR 2025)
Abstract

This study investigates regulatory gaps impeding artificial intelligence (AI) integration in public sector logistics, revealing how fragmented legislative frameworks hinder operational efficiency and innovation. Through a quantitative cross-sectional survey of 182 legal professionals, public employees, and AI/legal scholars using stratified purposive sampling and validated instruments (Cronbach’s α=0.985) we identified statistically significant stakeholder divergences (*p*<0.05) via χ² tests and Cramer’s V effect sizes. Key findings demonstrate that: (1) legal experts prioritize regulatory clarity deficits (M=4.62), while public staff emphasize institutional resistance (M=4.41); (2) human capital training is systematically undervalued (M=2.57, V=0.26) despite its theoretical importance; and (3) while regulation enhances operational efficiency (M=4.36), it paradoxically inhibits logistical innovation (M=2.48), exposing a critical innovation-governance disconnect. The study’s core contribution, a Dynamic Institutional Alignment Framework, resolves this tension through three pillars: human-centered regulatory design integrating legal-technical dimensions, adaptive policy sandboxes synchronized with AI advancement cycles, and stakeholder-specific implementation pathways. By embedding institutional adaptability within global compliance standards (EU AI Act, OECD Principles), this framework advances AI governance theory and offers public institutions actionable strategies for balancing technological advancement with accountability.

Mohamed Hadi Al Najdawi , Tamadher Al Dabbagh, Raghda Raafat, Ahmad Aburayya,
Volume 36, Issue 3 (IJIEPR 2025)
Abstract

This study investigates the role of administrative governance mechanisms in enhancing institutional integrity and transparency while reducing administrative corruption in public institutions. Employing a quantitative analytical approach, primary data were collected through a structured questionnaire distributed to 50 respondents across oversight bodies, inspection departments, and academic experts in Jordan, yielding a 90% response rate (n = 45). The analysis, based on descriptive and inferential statistics (Ka² tests, α = 0.05), demonstrated that the application of governance principles, particularly transparency, accountability, and administrative oversight, was significantly associated with improved institutional performance and a measurable decline in perceived corruption. Specifically, the study found that respondents largely agreed (mean = 4.04; SD = 1.10) on the effectiveness of regulatory and legal frameworks in combating corruption, while 88% supported the role of continuous monitoring in promoting integrity. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these relationships across stakeholder categories. From the findings, a major standing for the immediate modernization of legal-administrative frameworks, training for governance implementation, and institutionalization of oversight mechanisms emerges. Concluding that administrative governance is vital to institutional integrity and sustainability, this study's contribution lies in filling the gap by providing an evidence-based argument pertinent to anti-corruption policies, legal reforms, and modernizing the public sector within developing contexts.


Page 1 from 1