Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Hadi Al Najdawi
Enhancing Logistical Efficiency in Public Institutions through AI: A Managerial Framework for Regulatory and Technological Integration
Mohamed Hadi Al Najdawi, Zainab Al Ghurabli, Raghda Raafat, Ahmad Aburayya,
Volume 0, Issue 0 (IJIEPR 2024)
Abstract
This study addresses the lack of defined legislative frameworks governing artificial intelligence (AI) use in logistical support within public institutions, which leads to organizational and technological inefficiencies. Its primary objective is to examine the legal regulation of AI in this domain and evaluate the current framework, aiming to maximize efficiency while ensuring accountability and transparency. The research employs a quantitative survey methodology, collecting data via questionnaires from relevant stakeholders (the study community). Key findings reveal that the absence of specific AI regulations hinders operational effectiveness and necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration between legal and technological domains for sustainable AI implementation. The research concludes that establishing a comprehensive, adaptable regulatory framework, accounting for technological advancements and both local and global contexts, is essential. Its core contribution is the proposal for collaborative development between legal policymakers and technology experts to establish integrated rules that foster innovation while safeguarding user rights.
The Role of Administrative Governance in Enhancing Integrity and Transparency and Reducing Administrative Corruption in Public Institutions: An Analytical Study
Mohamed Hadi Al Najdawi, Tamadher Al Dabbagh, Raghda Raafat, Ahmad Aburayya,
Volume 0, Issue 0 (IJIEPR 2024)
Abstract
This study investigates the role of administrative governance mechanisms in enhancing institutional integrity and transparency while reducing administrative corruption in public institutions. Employing a quantitative analytical approach, primary data were collected through a structured questionnaire distributed to 50 respondents across oversight bodies, inspection departments, and academic experts in Jordan, yielding a 90% response rate (n = 45). The analysis, based on descriptive and inferential statistics (Ka² tests, α = 0.05), demonstrated that the application of governance principles, particularly transparency, accountability, and administrative oversight, was significantly associated with improved institutional performance and a measurable decline in perceived corruption. Specifically, the study found that respondents largely agreed (mean = 4.04; SD = 1.10) on the effectiveness of regulatory and legal frameworks in combating corruption, while 88% supported the role of continuous monitoring in promoting integrity. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these relationships across stakeholder categories. From the findings, a major standing for the immediate modernization of legal-administrative frameworks, training for governance implementation, and institutionalization of oversight mechanisms emerges. Concluding that administrative governance is vital to institutional integrity and sustainability, this study's contribution lies in filling the gap by providing an evidence-based argument pertinent to anti-corruption policies, legal reforms, and modernizing the public sector within developing contexts.

Page 1 from 1